Kurzweil against an AI critic: (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, September 15, 2010, 01:02 (5183 days ago) @ David Turell

Ok, so assume for a moment that they are able to model a brain. Woohoo! Can they build it, possibly. With enough processors and sub-processors it might be possible. Would it function as efficiently? It might seem to at first, but I doubt it. Even IF they succeed at modeling it and building a circuited version, unless they figure out how to make a biochemical version, it will not be capable of the elegant beauty of the human brain. Why? Because hardware can't rebuild itself to suit it's needs. It can in a fashion, by making and breaking paths between sub-processors, but not to the same extent as the brain.
> 
> Poor Matt. Now it is two against one!-Actually a much stronger argument is presented by Graham Dustin Martin by simply asking how it would possibly "correctly" model human experience. He follows a tact of demonstrating that language is an abstraction of reality, and therefore no machine could contain THAT part of human experience as a result.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"