Pansychism; supporting paper from physicists (Introduction)
Another strained take from a differing viewpoint:
https://bigthink.com/hard-science/new-hypothesis-argues-the-universe-simulates-itself-i...
"The physical universe is a “strange loop” says the new paper titled “The Self-Simulation Hypothesis Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics” from the team at the Quantum Gravity Research, a Los Angeles-based theoretical physics institute founded by the scientist and entrepreneur Klee Irwin. They take Bostrom’s simulation hypothesis, which maintains that all of reality is an extremely detailed computer program, and ask, rather than relying on advanced lifeforms to create the amazing technology necessary to compose everything within our world, isn’t it more efficient to propose that the universe itself is a “mental self-simulation”? They tie this idea to quantum mechanics, seeing the universe as one of many possible quantum gravity models.
***
"But where does the physical reality that would generate the simulations comes from, wonder the researchers? Their hypothesis takes a non-materialistic approach, saying that everything is information expressed as thought. As such, the universe “self-actualizes” itself into existence, relying on underlying algorithms and a rule they call “the principle of efficient language.” (my bold)
***
"Under this proposal, the entire simulation of everything in existence is just one “grand thought.” How would the simulation itself be originated? It was always there, say the researchers, explaining the concept of “timeless emergentism.” According to this idea, time isn’t there at all. Instead, the all-encompassing thought that is our reality offers a nested semblance of a hierarchical order, full of “sub-thoughts” that reach all the way down the rabbit hole towards the base mathematics and fundamental particles. This is also where the rule of efficient language comes in, suggesting that humans themselves are such “emergent sub-thoughts” and they experience and find meaning in the world through other sub-thoughts (called “code-steps or actions”) in the most economical fashion.
***
"The scientists link their hypothesis to panpsychism, which sees everything as thought or consciousness. The authors think that their “panpsychic self-simulation model” can even explain the origin of an overarching panconsciousness at the foundational level of the simulations, which “self-actualizes itself in a strange loop via self-simulation.” This panconsciousness also has free will and its various nested levels essentially have the ability to select what code to actualize, while making syntax choices. The goal of this consciousness? To generate meaning or information.
***
"The team also proposes that in the coming years we will be able to create designer consciousnesses for ourselves as advancements in gene editing could allow us to make our own mind-simulations much more powerful. We may also see minds emerging that do not require matter at all.
"While some of these ideas are certainly controversial in the mainstream science circles, Klee and his team respond that “We must critically think about consciousness and certain aspects of philosophy that are uncomfortable subjects to some scientists.'” (my bold)
Comment: this whole paper reads like my God theory that we live in His consciousness. of course they cannot drag Him in. To see the real very complex serious paper:
https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/2/247/htm
"Abstract
We modify the simulation hypothesis to a self-simulation hypothesis, where the physical universe, as a strange loop, is a mental self-simulation that might exist as one of a broad class of possible code theoretic quantum gravity models of reality obeying the principle of efficient language axiom. This leads to ontological interpretations about quantum mechanics. We also discuss some implications of the self-simulation hypothesis such as an informational arrow of time. (my bold)
***
"Conclusions
We introduce the self-simulation hypothesis as a modification of the simulation hypothesis. We consider the assumption of mental simulations to be more plausible than computer simulations because, as with lucid dreams, they are currently more precise. Furthermore, humanity’s recent hacking of evolutionary biology, via CRISPR gene editing, is likely to allow rapid evolution of consciousness in the future—designer consciousness—that can make mind-simulations even more powerful. Future non-local quantum gravity theories and deeper understanding of what consciousness is may allow new forms of mind to emerge from networks of biological consciousnesses or that do not require matter in the first place. The upper limit of energy in the universe that can self-organize into conscious systems and networked systems of conscious systems is 100% of the energy. (my bold)
Complete thread:
- Pansychism -
dhw,
2013-09-28, 14:01
- Pansychism - David Turell, 2013-09-29, 02:21
- Pansychism -
George Jelliss,
2013-10-01, 15:48
- Pansychism - David Turell, 2013-10-02, 02:23
- Pansychism - dhw, 2013-10-02, 17:52
- Pansychism; a good discussion -
David Turell,
2014-01-02, 19:58
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2019-08-31, 17:25
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2019-09-01, 12:25
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2019-09-01, 15:31
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2019-09-02, 09:28
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2019-09-02, 15:47
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2019-09-03, 09:29
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2019-09-03, 17:39
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2019-09-04, 09:58
- Pansychism; a supporting essay - David Turell, 2019-09-04, 16:48
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2020-05-17, 21:59
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2020-05-18, 13:35
- Pansychism; a supporting essay - David Turell, 2020-05-18, 18:40
- Pansychism; supporting paper from physicists - David Turell, 2021-09-20, 15:25
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2020-05-18, 13:35
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2019-09-04, 09:58
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2019-09-03, 17:39
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2019-09-03, 09:29
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2019-09-02, 15:47
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2019-09-02, 09:28
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2019-09-01, 15:31
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
dhw,
2019-09-01, 12:25
- Pansychism; a supporting essay -
David Turell,
2019-08-31, 17:25