Punctuated Equilibrium support from research? (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Saturday, December 19, 2009, 15:55 (5452 days ago) @ David Turell

Here are two entries about the same study, which purports to show, that 80% of the time, new species appear from a single event, not multiple slow steps.
> 
> http://www.physorg.com/news179737267.html
> 
> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature08630.html
&#... 
> Note the author's comments that Darwinists will not like his findings.-Ah, I can kind of see now why you use the term "Darwinist." I certainly like this model even if I can't get access to the paper itself. -Even if the view of evolution changes however, I still don't understand how it would support design over chance. Those genes will still need to be transferred to a future generation--to beat the same drum--so differentiating this model from the darwinian can quite simply be a semantic argument based on what constitutes a major change. To resolve it you'd have to really look at the DNA line by line from the "parent" to the "child," and come up with a % difference that is more than the mutation rate provided by sexual reproduction alone. In this test I'm going to be strict and say that a major change is only that which is beyond what one would expect from typical sexual reproduction. It would also have to be a trait transmissible to the "child's" children.-I say this because sometimes drastic events happen with minor changes in genetic coding, there's no guarantee that a jump in phenotype results from a "drastic change" in genotype.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"