Nothing (General)
I looked at the George Ellis article, though I had to register with the Institute of Physics to read it. > > His opinion is: "The author is thus committing a category error in trying to use scientific proof in areas where it simply does not apply."-Ellis has other reasonable criticisms that Geoerge has not listed. If you don't want to register use my sign in: Caesaar and 1041993
Complete thread:
- Nothing -
dhw,
2009-11-26, 11:40
- Nothing -
George Jelliss,
2009-11-27, 20:11
- Nothing -
David Turell,
2009-11-27, 20:49
- Nothing -
George Jelliss,
2009-11-28, 19:44
- Nothing - David Turell, 2009-11-29, 00:59
- Nothing -
dhw,
2009-11-30, 14:47
- Nothing -
David Turell,
2009-11-30, 16:50
- Nothing -
George Jelliss,
2009-11-30, 17:28
- Nothing - David Turell, 2009-11-30, 18:48
- Nothing -
George Jelliss,
2009-11-30, 17:28
- Nothing -
George Jelliss,
2009-11-30, 17:02
- Nothing - David Turell, 2009-11-30, 17:23
- Nothing -
dhw,
2009-12-01, 11:38
- Nothing - George Jelliss, 2009-12-04, 17:53
- Nothing -
David Turell,
2009-11-30, 16:50
- Nothing -
George Jelliss,
2009-11-28, 19:44
- Nothing -
David Turell,
2009-11-27, 20:49
- Nothing -
George Jelliss,
2009-11-27, 20:11