Going deeper into a DI Lie (Politics)

by David Turell @, Saturday, October 17, 2009, 02:22 (4639 days ago) @ xeno6696

I would say that considering his profile that the general (and absolute) silence of any voices condemning him for his theological views proves my point. -We are talking around the issue I tried to address before. The tremendous liberal slant in the colleges and universities, and in the science labs. That is not good for American education, research, or politics. You are right,Collins is acceptable, but Rush Limbaugh is not, in his case for the NFL. 95% of Hollywood is very liberal. That propaganda machine can slant any national discussion. Most of the newspapers and their writers are liberal, again around 90%. Freedom of the press was constitutionally suppposed to inform us and protect us from misinformation. But not on a one way slant. This is what I was driving at. I don't care a wit about the DI. But some of the information that they point out is worth discussing as this article on trying to set up an evolutionary tree by using genes, instead of morphology. It has been shown in the past that common proteins create different trees than morphology, or just mess up the morphology tree. (Evolution, A theory in Crisis, Michael Denton, 1985.) This article shows that getting to a single tree is a problem:- http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/6/R109#IDATWFPL

Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum