String Theory revisited (Introduction)
Matt should particularly be interested in this article, again noting that 40 years of string theory going almost nowhere: > > http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2009/09/is_string_theory_an_unphysical.php?utm_... I've had that issue for some time, but assuming you saw my spam about the first real-world application of a string-theoretic formula, I'm no longer prepared to write it off completely. -To counter that minor bit of optimism: Newton's equations for gravity, although still useful; had the entirely wrong premise. String Theory has very far way to climb in order to be fully valid.
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Complete thread:
- String Theory revisited -
David Turell,
2009-09-21, 13:55
- String Theory revisited -
xeno6696,
2009-09-23, 02:46
- String Theory revisited -
David Turell,
2009-09-23, 14:40
- String Theory revisited - xeno6696, 2009-09-23, 15:30
- String Theory revisited -
David Turell,
2009-09-23, 14:40
- String Theory revisited -
xeno6696,
2009-09-23, 02:46