Misrepresenting Darwin (Evolution)
As regards variation, if all life evolved from the original self-replicating molecules, those molecules must have contained the potential for variation ... if they hadn't, nothing would have changed and there would have been no evolution. But in any case this makes no difference to the basic fact that belief in the theory of evolution is perfectly compatible with belief in design.-Hear, hear!! Exactly my starting point in the research and reasoning I have done. And on point (I think) is the following bit of scientific comment on one of my favorite subjects, microRNA, which fits my theory exactly:-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19472371
Complete thread:
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
dhw,
2009-09-11, 08:31
- The Nature of Design -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-11, 22:43
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
dhw,
2009-09-12, 14:18
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-12, 21:50
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
dhw,
2009-09-14, 08:19
- Misrepresenting Darwin - David Turell, 2009-09-14, 14:41
- Misrepresenting Darwin - David Turell, 2009-09-14, 18:52
- Misrepresenting Darwin - David Turell, 2009-09-15, 14:24
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
dhw,
2009-09-14, 08:19
- Misrepresenting Darwin - xeno6696, 2009-09-15, 22:24
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-12, 21:50
- The Nature of Design - David Turell, 2009-09-12, 17:00
- The Nature of Design - dhw, 2009-09-15, 08:37
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
dhw,
2009-09-12, 14:18
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
xeno6696,
2009-09-15, 22:13
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
dhw,
2009-09-17, 08:38
- Misrepresenting Darwin - David Turell, 2009-09-17, 14:46
- Misrepresenting Darwin - xeno6696, 2009-09-17, 16:08
- Misrepresenting Darwin -
dhw,
2009-09-17, 08:38
- The Nature of Design -
George Jelliss,
2009-09-11, 22:43