Scientific proof doesn't exist (Introduction)

by David Turell , Sunday, November 08, 2015, 22:44 (3302 days ago) @ romansh

Romansh: There are some mathematical laws, the rest is still theory:
> > 
> > http://www.livescience.com/50521-wheres-the-proof-in-science-there-is-none.html?cmpid=N... > 
> > "I think it is best to leave the last word to one of the greatest physicists, Richard Feynman, on what being a scientist is all about:
> > 
> > 
> > "I have approximate answers and possible beliefs in different degrees of certainty about different things, but I'm not absolutely sure of anything."
> 
> And this is why I bring you to task when you talk about proof ... other than strong alcoholic beverages-Actually at this level of discourse, I fully agree with you. Remember I follow Adler: proof beyond a reasonable doubt. When I reach that point, I have faith that I am right. Do I recognize that I am fallible? Of course. Absolute proof of anything does not exist, except in math.