Abiogenesis (Origins)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 04:03 (5568 days ago) @ George Jelliss

George, - > The latest on abiogenesis
> 
> Glycine found in comets
> http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSTRE57H02I20090818?feedType=RSS&feedN... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090817143602.htm
> 
> Nucleobases found in meteorites
> http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/icl-sct061308.php
> 
> Video by cdkoo7 on abiogenesis according to Prof. Szostak
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg
> 
> The above video explains the essentials very clearly.
> 
> Interview with Jack Szostak
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OwSARYTK7w
> 
> Lies ... and probability of abiogenesis
> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/abioprob.html
> 
> The above is about why the enormous improbabilities calculated by creationists / intelligent desighners are nonsense. - As much of a fan of abiogenesis as I am, at this point the detractors have an upper hand purely in terms that we simply don't have enough evidence yet. (I'm speaking strictly logically, as if it was a court case.) Though for some people (Turell) creating a chain of reactions that would result in life wouldn't nullify a creator, it would necessarily mean that one would not need to be invoked. - I have faith in science, but my time in biochem and computer labs make me a helluva lot more cautious than it would be to say we've solved the problem. We have tantalizing clues, and to me Turell's pointing out that only 8 amino acids of 20 were present brings a whole host of needed explanations. I agree with you that we don't need to invoke a deity, but neither will I accept that we have a good enough scientific explanation at this juncture.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"