Evidence for pre-planning (Introduction)

by David Turell @, Monday, September 15, 2014, 01:34 (3722 days ago)

The lamprey is an animal from the Cambrian and shows HOX genes in the same order as much more advanced animals that evolved later. Pre-planning is the best explanation:-"The team at Stowers, collaborating with Marianne Bronner, Ph.D., professor of biology at Caltech, focused on the sea lamprey because the fossil record shows that its ancestors emerged from Cambrian silt approximately 500 million years ago, 100 million years before jawed fish ever swam onto the scene. The question was, could the hindbrain gene regulatory network that constructs the "modern" vertebrate head have originated in animals that lack those structures?
 
"To answer it, the researchers created so-called "reporter" genes from stretches of regulatory DNA flanking a specific Hox gene in zebrafish or mice and linked them to fluorescent tags. When inserted into an experimental animal these types of reporters glow in tissues where the gene is activated, or "expressed". The researchers chose this particular battery of Hox reporters because when inserted in embryos of a jawed fish they fluoresce in adjacent rainbow stripes up and down the embryonic hindbrain.
 
"The paper's startling finding came when they inserted the very same reporters into lamprey embryos using a technique developed by Hugo Parker, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow in the Krumlauf lab and the study's first author: the lamprey embryos displayed the same rainbow pattern of Hox reporters as did jawed fish, in exactly the same order along the AP axis of the hindbrain.
 
"We were surprised to see any reporter expression in lamprey, much less a pattern that resembles the pattern in a mouse or fish," says Parker, who pioneered the lamprey reporter approach as a graduate student at London's Queen Mary University. "That means that the gene regulatory network that governs segmental patterning of the hindbrain likely evolved prior to divergence of jawed vertebrates."-
 Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2014-09-ancient-vertebrate-familiar-tools-strange-looking.html#jCp... more the genomes are studied the more this will be found.

Evidence for pre-planning

by Balance_Maintained @, U.S.A., Monday, September 15, 2014, 03:19 (3722 days ago) @ David Turell

You know, pretty soon, as they find these major things further and further back in time, they aren't going to have any time left for anything to evolved. Then what will they do?

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.

Evidence for pre-planning

by David Turell @, Tuesday, September 16, 2014, 15:43 (3721 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Another take on the same study:-"In the study, Investigator and Scientific Director Robb Krumlauf, Ph.D. and colleagues show that the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus, a survivor of ancient jawless vertebrates, exhibits a pattern of gene expression that is reminiscent of its jawed cousins, who evolved much, much later. Those genes, called Hox genes, function like a molecular ruler, determining where along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis an animal will place a particular feature or appendage. The new study means that that the genetic program used by jawed vertebrates, including fish, mice, and us, was up and running ages before a vertebrate ever possessed a recognizable face." (my bold)-http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140914160238.htm

Evidence for pre-planning; humans and yeast

by David Turell @, Wednesday, May 27, 2015, 18:04 (3468 days ago) @ David Turell

50% of human genes used in yeast work!-http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/43043/title/Human-Genes-Can-Save-Yeast/-"A large number of human genes can substitute for their defective counterparts in yeast and prevent the microorganisms from dying, according to a paper published today (May 21) in Science. Of more than 400 human-to-yeast gene replacements performed, almost 50 percent were effective at compensating for a missing vital function.-"Bakers' yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) shared a common ancestor with humans about a billion years ago. And this relationship, albeit distant, means that “when we read the DNA and look at their genomes we can recognize many equivalences,” said molecular biologist Edward Marcotte of the University of Texas at Austin who led the new study. “In fact, there are thousands of genes shared between humans and yeast.”-"These shared genes may appear similar, but Marcotte wanted to put them to the test, asking: “Are they swappable?” That is, could the gene encoding a human protein replace the corresponding gene in a yeast cell? Such experiments have been performed for a number of individual genes, but a large-scale, systematic approach had been lacking. “We wanted to test it for as many genes as we could feasibly do,” Marcotte said.-"The team chose test genes based on two criteria: that the yeast version of the gene was present in a single copy and that it served a function critical to cell survival. Using yeast strains in which these critical genes could be turned off at will, the team tested whether transfer of the equivalent, or orthologous, human gene could save the yeast from death.-"Forty-three percent of the 414 gene replacements the team performed could indeed rescue the yeasts' growth defects. Incorporating data from previously reported substitution experiments, that percentage rose to 47.-*****-"Abstract: To determine whether genes retain ancestral functions over a billion years of evolution and to identify principles of deep evolutionary divergence, we replaced 414 essential yeast genes with their human orthologs, assaying for complementation of lethal growth defects upon loss of the yeast genes. Nearly half (47%) of the yeast genes could be successfully humanized. Sequence similarity and expression only partly predicted replaceability. Instead, replaceability depended strongly on gene modules: Genes in the same process tended to be similarly replaceable (e.g., sterol biosynthesis) or not (e.g., DNA replication initiation). Simulations confirmed that selection for specific function can maintain replaceability despite extensive sequence divergence. Critical ancestral functions of many essential genes are thus retained in a pathway-specific manner, resilient to drift in sequences, splicing, and protein interfaces. (paywall) - A.H. Kachroo et al., “Systematic humanization of yeast genes reveals conserved functions and genetic modularity,” Science, 348:921-25, 2015."-Looks like pattern pre-planning to me, as previously discussed, as well as evidence that some type of evolutionary design controls are in place. Hard to deny evolution as a process with this kind of evidence, but it sure smells of Theistic guidance.

RSS Feed of thread
powered by my little forum