Peer Review: another sting works (Introduction)

by George Jelliss , Crewe, Friday, October 04, 2013, 17:49 (4069 days ago) @ David Turell

There is quite a lot about this "sting" on twitter. Here are some links:-Stephen Curry: Has numerous articles on Open Access Publishing
http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/-from Stephen Curry: is it about peer review or open access?
http://im2punt0.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/science-mag-sting-of-oa-journals-is-it-about-open-access-or-about-peer-review/-from Ben Goldacre: an author who questions the ethics of the "sting"
http://www.thefacultylounge.org/2013/10/schadefreude-for-those-who-publish-in-non-peer-review-law-reviews-and-the-blurry-line-between-human-.html-from Ben Goldacre: a site that lists malpractices
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/-The publishing of scientific papers is evolving towards open access 
publishing combined with crowd-sourced reviewing.

--
GPJ

Post reply

4079 views

Complete thread:

RSS Feed of thread

Peer Review: latest review - David Turell, 2012-10-09, 14:56
- Peer Review: another mess - David Turell, 2013-02-26, 14:42
  - Peer Review: another mess - David Turell, 2013-05-30, 15:19
    - Peer Review: another opinion - David Turell, 2013-06-25, 15:33
      - Peer Review: another sting works - David Turell, 2013-10-04, 15:46
        Peer Review: another sting works - BBella, 2013-10-04, 17:16
        
        Peer Review: another sting works - George Jelliss, 2013-10-04, 17:49
        The future of science publishing - George Jelliss, 2013-10-12, 00:08
        The future of science publishing - David Turell, 2013-10-12, 02:10
        
        Peer Review: another says bad - David Turell, 2013-10-15, 18:33
        Peer Review: bad science - David Turell, 2013-10-20, 01:08
        Peer Review: bad science - David Turell, 2013-11-22, 01:24
        Peer Review: bad science - George Jelliss, 2014-02-25, 08:31
        Peer Review: bad science - David Turell, 2014-02-25, 15:18
        Peer Review: more fraud - David Turell, 2014-07-09, 01:55
        Peer Review: good review - David Turell, 2014-09-28, 15:20
        Peer Review: more study retractions - David Turell, 2014-12-10, 22:06
        Peer Review: shoddy publishing - David Turell, 2014-12-17, 00:44
        Peer Review: 2014 retraction review - David Turell, 2014-12-23, 14:39
        Peer Review: Double blind reviews - David Turell, 2015-02-19, 15:07
        Peer Review: More mess - David Turell, 2015-03-27, 22:08
        Peer Review: More retractions - David Turell, 2015-08-18, 14:03
- Peer Review: psycology studies mostly wrong - David Turell, 2015-09-01, 14:23
  - Peer Review: psycology studies mostly wrong - David Turell, 2015-09-23, 05:28
    - Peer Review: more bad press - David Turell, 2015-11-04, 00:40
      - Peer Review: more bad press - David Turell, 2018-12-02, 21:50
        Peer Review: more bad press - dhw, 2018-12-03, 14:35
        
        Peer Review: predatory journals - David Turell, 2019-03-11, 00:37
        Peer Review: predatory journals - dhw, 2019-03-11, 11:15

AgnosticWeb.com

Peer Review: another sting works (Introduction)