Absence of Evidence (The limitations of science)

by dhw, Monday, March 03, 2008, 10:21 (5891 days ago) @ David Turell

David Turell is "struck by the fact that no presentation of scientific findings is offered" on this website, and also asks if he should offer his view on why "there is no progress" in the field of how life began. - First of all, an emphatic yes please to your offer. George Jellis drew our attention to work being done in the field of abiogenesis, concerning which he and I had an exchange of views on the thread "Teapot Agnosticism" (3rd February, 4th February), but generally the discussion has, as you say, been more philosophical and badly needs to be opened out. You have already done this for us, and although I can only speak for myself, I would be grateful for more! - I still can't get the Lancet article by Pim Van Lommel, and although I have found a long list of entries about you on Google, it would save a protracted search if you would kindly give us the address of your own website.