Quantum theory: Niels Bohr (Introduction)

by David Turell , Saturday, July 13, 2013, 21:34 (4151 days ago) @ BBella


> 
> bbella: I would have to agree with Bohr here and add to his list - the "truth" of experience. For the experiencer, no proof by an outsider (scientist, witness, etc) of the experience is needed to make it "truth" and to know what they experienced was/is true. And if it was true, in that it actually did happen to them, whether in mind or body, would it then not be considered "truth?" Or, consider the possibility something can be true for one and not "truth" for all? 
> 
> >Whatever "truth" may be, we should not assume that science has a monopoly on it.
> 
> Agreed.-As I've stated before, we don't unerstand the quantum level of our existence,and so cannot go deeper than where we are. Our full truth is not known and may never be.