The Paranormal (Where is it now?)

by John Clinch , Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 12:56 (5748 days ago) @ George Jelliss

Oh, you can go further, surely. - BB seems to be saying, though her post is fairly incoherent: chi is real because (a) the concept is ancient and (b) because it represents something - wind - that can be measured. - On that basis, something is more likely to be true because people believed in it long ago. Anyone had their four humours tested recently? - And, BB, you are equating the representation of something with the thing itself. You seem to be saying chi is real because wind is. It's a total non-sequitur.