Encode rejected (Introduction)
A very critical paper has just appeared downplaying the ENCODE claim that 80% of DNA is functional. The meaning of the word functional is debated and twisted in a extraordinary way. My take is that the huge DNA molecule at times has controlling segments which need to be a a certain 3-D realtionship to the gene. The DNA is coiled around histone spools and this arrangement requires modifying elements, various RNAs, to be at a seeming distance when DNA is expressed in a linear fashion, but in fact those elements are close by in the naturally coiled state. -http://gbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/02/20/gbe.evt028.full.pdf+html
Complete thread:
- Pseudogenes do function -
David Turell,
2012-10-20, 01:08
- Encode supported -
David Turell,
2012-11-01, 14:24
- Encode supported -
David Turell,
2012-11-05, 20:37
- Encode rejected -
David Turell,
2013-02-22, 23:22
- Encode rejected -
dhw,
2013-02-23, 12:52
- Encode rejected -
David Turell,
2013-02-23, 15:38
- Encode rejected -
dhw,
2013-02-24, 12:44
- Encode rejected -
David Turell,
2013-02-24, 18:24
- Encode rejected -
dhw,
2013-02-25, 11:31
- Encode rejected - David Turell, 2013-02-26, 02:10
- Encode rejected -
dhw,
2013-02-25, 11:31
- Encode rejected -
David Turell,
2013-02-24, 18:24
- Encode rejected -
dhw,
2013-02-24, 12:44
- Encode rejected -
David Turell,
2013-02-23, 15:38
- Encode rejected -
dhw,
2013-02-23, 12:52
- Encode rejected -
David Turell,
2013-02-22, 23:22
- Encode supported? -
David Turell,
2013-04-12, 22:27
- Encode discussion - David Turell, 2013-04-13, 20:11
- Encode supported? -
David Turell,
2013-08-05, 15:48
- Encode supported? - David Turell, 2013-08-15, 18:54
- Encode supported -
David Turell,
2012-11-05, 20:37
- Encode supported -
David Turell,
2012-11-01, 14:24