Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything (Introduction)
A very twisted blog om Alexander Eben's NDE articles and book. The Lancet study of 1990 is mentioned, and completely ignores the pertinent findings. The usual culprits, the ateists, are quoted with objections that are given full credence. The passage of true information that could not have been known to the patient during the episode, the sine qua non of the evidence, is not mentioned. A very biased blog.-http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/12/03/the-death-of-near-death-even-if-heaven-is-real-you-arent-seeing-it/?WT_mc_id=SA_DD_20121204
Complete thread:
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything -
David Turell,
2012-12-04, 20:49
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response -
David Turell,
2021-12-27, 18:31
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response -
dhw,
2021-12-28, 14:19
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response -
David Turell,
2021-12-28, 15:54
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response -
dhw,
2021-12-29, 12:27
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response - David Turell, 2021-12-29, 15:08
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response -
dhw,
2021-12-29, 12:27
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response -
David Turell,
2021-12-28, 15:54
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response -
dhw,
2021-12-28, 14:19
- Sci. Am. denies NDE\'s mean anything: Greyson's response -
David Turell,
2021-12-27, 18:31