NEO-DARWINISM JUST DIED: Junk DNA or useful (Introduction)

by David Turell , Friday, September 07, 2012, 15:34 (4439 days ago) @ David Turell

Larry Moran at Sandwalk has listed a group of objections. The Guardian was most accurate in its assessment of these early findings: very active DNA 9%, quite active 20%, somewhat functional 80%. But the major point is having slight attention. This is an 11 year preliminary study, with only a little of DNA carefully studied despite the massive number of lab assets being used so far. With a six-plus-foot molecule, when stretched out having 3.2 billion bases, they have looked at 10,000 places. Undoubtedly, in another 11 years, the complexity will be even more amazing. -Moran is correct: inbetween the active spots, there is inactive stuff. Darwinists theorize this is left over stuff from evolution, now abandoned. There is no proof of this supposition. It sounds good. Since DNA works in a 3-D arrangement, the strung out version is a man-made aberration of how things work. The active triggers controlling gene expression are close by the genes they work with. The inactive material could be spacers to provide the right 3-D proximity of each gene complex (gene plus triggers).-My obvious point: given enough research time, it is all going to get even more complex, and complexer than that. So now Darwinists must explain complex information, in a very complex information code (better than anything we have invented for our computers), all by a purposeless scenario. No wonder several phnilosophers of science have their doubts.-http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/