New findings doubt his approach:-http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22144-brain-might-not-stand-in-the-way-of-free-will.html

New findings doubt his approach:
> 
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22144-brain-might-not-stand-in-the-way-of-free-wi... I said a couple weeks ago--and need to finish off with dhw--free will is not something I consider a valid question to ask anymore. Libet? Dennett? Decartes? Schopenhauer? -Wasted their time on that question.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"

More findings negate Libet:-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24105593

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=U5baL9oh430-Between 14 and 24 minutes

Mistake. It is Tallis, not Nagel. My aging brain

Research in ping pong. Yes there is a 200 millisecond delay, but the game is played and the brain areas coordinate relatively unconsciously:-http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-08-brain-interact-cognitive.html