Political bias in Wikipedia (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Sunday, June 24, 2012, 18:02 (4318 days ago) @ romansh

You need to be more specific about *which* part of my posts you take issue with! I can understand more about this objection on this go-around.
> 
> I don't have an issue with your post. Just making sure I understand it.
> -My apologies. I'm used to opposition! -> Regarding the study, I would have to delve more deeply but I can't say I am that curious. A question that does come to mind is, are the authors simply doing a phrase count (eg civil liberties) and divvying up phrases into liberal and conservative?-I didn't read the paper (sociology is too... opinion-based for me), but at a high level it looks like that's exactly what they did.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"