Matt: Did you withdraw it? I looked it up. He is properly anti-Darwin and it seems as if he is proporting pan-spermism or some such theory.-I looked into the first of a couple of his arguments (such as the "crystal skull" and... I just can't support it as a valid argument. He uses an encepholpathic child's skull as the basis for a panspermia...

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"