Note to dhw about spam: (Introduction)
by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Monday, June 11, 2012, 12:31 (4549 days ago)
I'd strongly consider moving to a moderated board format, so that only posts that are not spam would make it through.
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Note to dhw about spam:
by dhw, Monday, June 11, 2012, 15:46 (4549 days ago) @ xeno6696
MATT: I'd strongly consider moving to a moderated board format, so that only posts that are not spam would make it through.-Thanks, Matt. I've passed this on to Neil (who administers the site). It's really got to the stage where we have to put a stop to it.
Note to dhw about spam:
by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Monday, June 11, 2012, 16:36 (4549 days ago) @ dhw
It really has gotten bad recently. What a shame. You want I should break their kneecaps, Boss? :P Seriously, though, it is rather distracting.
--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.
Note to dhw about spam:
by David Turell , Monday, June 11, 2012, 18:59 (4549 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained
It really has gotten bad recently. What a shame. You want I should break their kneecaps, Boss? :P Seriously, though, it is rather distracting.-Is adding moderation expensive?
Note to dhw about spam:
by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Monday, June 11, 2012, 19:33 (4549 days ago) @ David Turell
Not compared with my kneecap breaking services :) -Actually, it can be free. Any of the regular posters can given moderator privileges. It all depends on how it is set up.
--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.
Note to dhw about spam:
by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Monday, June 11, 2012, 22:18 (4549 days ago) @ David Turell
It really has gotten bad recently. What a shame. You want I should break their kneecaps, Boss? :P Seriously, though, it is rather distracting. > > Is adding moderation expensive?-It shouldn't be... all it means is that dhw would have to read every post from non-registered users and approve/deny. There's few of those. And he reads everything anyways. -From a technical perspective it depends on exactly what kind of web framework his admin uses.
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Note to dhw about spam:
by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Monday, June 11, 2012, 22:40 (4549 days ago) @ xeno6696
You could also do it slightly differently by setting permissions, so that the regular posters are unmoderated, while new posters have to go through the moderation process until they have established that they are not spam bots.
--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.
Note to dhw about spam:
by dhw, Tuesday, June 12, 2012, 13:56 (4548 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained
Many thanks for your comments and suggestions ... especially Tony's noble offer to kneecap the idiots who are trying to wreck the site. At present I'm logging on three or four times a day to delete the spam, but of course it accumulates during the night and clogs up the list of 40 last entries. It would be interesting to know how Romansh and Agnostics International deal with it.-I'm still waiting for Neil to get back to me. He is our technical wizard, but maybe he's away at the moment. We might have to get all contributors to register, as I think it's possible then to block posts from the undesirables. I don't like forcing folk to do this, as I myself am extremely wary of any site that demands personal details, but it may be the only way ... at least temporarily. And as far as I know, all our regular writers have already registered anyway. But let's see what Neil suggests.
Note to dhw about spam:
by DragonsHeart , Tuesday, June 12, 2012, 15:57 (4548 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained
I see one slight problem with Tony's suggestion. There are some of us who are very regular readers who only post occasionally, like myself. If only the regular posters are not moderated, it would leave those of us who are still regulars in the lurch. What about setting up a captcha at the log-in like many chat clients do. It doesn't catch ALL the spam bots, but it gets most of them.
Note to dhw about spam:
by Neil , Tuesday, June 12, 2012, 19:57 (4548 days ago) @ xeno6696
There are a couple of spam prevention measures which can be used through the forum, one of which uses an akimet api key from http://akismet.com. This seems to have good press for Wordpress forums, I'll chat to DHW and see what we can come up with.