3am musings (Humans)

by Balance_Maintained @, U.S.A., Wednesday, September 07, 2011, 04:05 (4625 days ago)

It's late and I am jet lagged, so I apologize in advance for the mad ramblings that follow... but sometimes just writing them out is therapeutic. -
I was having a coffee and a smoke on the bridge, thinking about my ex-grandfather-in-law and some of our past interactions. When I was first married, he was a staunch Catholic and was extraordinarily persistent that I raise my children to be so as well, which I vehemently disagreed with for reasons that are inconsequential to this post. However, recently (almost ten years later) he has changed his tune saying that he doesn't care what they believe, only that they do. This led to a rather strange train of thoughts. Does it really matter what a person believes, or does it only matter that they DO believe in something? What is there to be found in belief? -The answer that struck me has me scratching my head. See, the answer that struck me is that EVERYTHING is found in belief. Sound, music, language, color, mathematics, science, religion, philosophy, art, love, everything. In fact, I am hard pressed to think of a single thing that doesn't depend on it. Even physics, with the Heisenberg Uncertainty principal relies on observation, or lack there of, which involves either belief in what you are seeing or faith that what you are not observing is happening. -I would love some feed back on this line of thought. Perhaps it is just the jet lag talking, but it is somewhat troubling to me.

3am musings

by David Turell @, Wednesday, September 07, 2011, 06:39 (4625 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Does it really matter what a person believes, or does it only matter that they DO believe in something? What is there to be found in belief? -But there are people who believe in nothing. Do your own thing, no rules, no judgment, no nothing. You obviously don't want to be one of those
> 
> The answer that struck me has me scratching my head. See, the answer that struck me is that EVERYTHING is found in belief. Sound, music, language, color, mathematics, science, religion, philosophy, art, love, everything. In fact, I am hard pressed to think of a single thing that doesn't depend on it.-I think you are painting this with too broad a brush stroke. One can be a non-believer and still appreciate music, art, love, math, philosophy, science, etc. Language, color, sound, I'm not sure.-> I would love some feed back on this line of thought. Perhaps it is just the jet lag talking, but it is somewhat troubling to me.-I'll take jet lag!

3am musings

by Balance_Maintained @, U.S.A., Wednesday, September 07, 2011, 19:14 (4625 days ago) @ David Turell

I think you are painting this with too broad a brush stroke. One can be a non-believer and still appreciate music, art, love, math, philosophy, science, etc. Language, color, sound, I'm not sure.
> -Perhaps, but you have to believe that the vibrations your ears are detecting are sounds, and that those sounds are arranged in a meaningful way in order to appreciate music or speech. You have to believe that the wavelengths of light that your eyes detect are colors and that these colors are arranged in a pleasing or meaningful way in order to appreciate art. You have to believe that numerical symbols have intrinsic meaning in order for math to mean anything at all. The only real thing that is independent of belief that I could come up with is motion, and as I said, the Uncertainty principal even casts that into doubt. In essence, every external sensation that we experience is motion, and all of that motion is interpreted via our brains into something meaningful. In order for it to be meaningful, it must be believed in. You must have faith that what your senses are telling you is not only real, but that the patterns they detect are of some value in one form or another.

3am musings

by David Turell @, Thursday, September 08, 2011, 02:27 (4624 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

In essence, every external sensation that we experience is motion, and all of that motion is interpreted via our brains into something meaningful. In order for it to be meaningful, it must be believed in. You must have faith that what your senses are telling you is not only real, but that the patterns they detect are of some value in one form or another.-In this sense you are correct, but most of us believe what we see, hear, feel, smell, etc. are real representations of our reality, even though our bodies send ionized signals over various distances to various neuron networks for interpretation. It is all very amazing, and extremely complex. Which has always been my main point in these discussions. The more we research life, the more complex the living processes are shown to be, the more reason for an intelligent diety, because the odds against chance doing all of this become infinitely small.

3am musings

by dhw, Friday, September 09, 2011, 14:36 (4623 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

TONY (Balance_Maintained): Does it really matter what a person believes, or does it only matter that they DO believe in something? What is there to be found in belief?-The answer that struck me has me scratching my head. See, the answer that struck me is that EVERYTHING is found in belief.-You must have faith that what your senses are telling you is not only real, but that the patterns they detect are of some value in one form or another.-I don't think it was the jet lag talking at all. Your thoughts remind me of George (Bishop) Berkeley (1685-1753), who argued that there was no such thing as matter, and all we have are our ideas, which are real to us. Of course, he went further, because he believed that the source of those ideas was God. Even if you believe, as I do, that matter is a reality outside of ourselves, there is still no way we can separate it from our perception of it, and even if there's a consensus that X is an apple and Y is an orange, our awareness of the consensus is also a form of subjective perception. -Your grandfather-in-law was obviously talking about religious belief, and I myself can see no necessity for that, but in the wider context I agree that belief in our own reality, that of others, and that of the material world around us is the foundation of nearly all our experiences and actions. Common sense and the approaching double-decker bus should tell us very clearly that we ignore this "reality" at our peril. Similarly with values: what matters to us matters. The subjectivity doesn't make it any the less real for us, and if you deny subjective values their reality, you may as well jump off the bridge, coffee in one hand and cigarette in the other! I don't know why you should find this thought troubling. I find it exciting. While I admit that it can be frustrating and at times quite terrifying that my own aesthetic, social, cultural and ethical values are not shared by others, I wouldn't want a world in which everyone had the same values as me. Nor would I want a world in which everything was clear-cut and indisputable. For those who believe in God, this vast variety of phenomena, the restrictions of the senses, the thwarted aspirations of the mind, may all be a tribute to his far-sighted, creative genius. For those who don't, all of it is simply a source of endless fascination. Either way, I'd be interested to know exactly why it troubles you.

3am musings

by Balance_Maintained @, U.S.A., Friday, September 09, 2011, 23:07 (4623 days ago) @ dhw

I don't think it was the jet lag talking at all. Your thoughts remind me of George (Bishop) Berkeley (1685-1753), who argued that there was no such thing as matter, and all we have are our ideas, which are real to us. Of course, he went further, because he believed that the source of those ideas was God. Even if you believe, as I do, that matter is a reality outside of ourselves, there is still no way we can separate it from our perception of it, and even if there's a consensus that X is an apple and Y is an orange, our awareness of the consensus is also a form of subjective perception. 
> -Matter and motion might well be a reality outside of ourselves on some level, I don't necessarily disagree with you on that. -> Your grandfather-in-law was obviously talking about religious belief, and I myself can see no necessity for that, but in the wider context I agree that belief in our own reality, that of others, and that of the material world around us is the foundation of nearly all our experiences and actions. Common sense and the approaching double-decker bus should tell us very clearly that we ignore this "reality" at our peril. Similarly with values: what matters to us matters. The subjectivity doesn't make it any the less real for us, and if you deny subjective values their reality, you may as well jump off the bridge, coffee in one hand and cigarette in the other! I don't know why you should find this thought troubling. I find it exciting. While I admit that it can be frustrating and at times quite terrifying that my own aesthetic, social, cultural and ethical values are not shared by others, I wouldn't want a world in which everyone had the same values as me. Nor would I want a world in which everything was clear-cut and indisputable. For those who believe in God, this vast variety of phenomena, the restrictions of the senses, the thwarted aspirations of the mind, may all be a tribute to his far-sighted, creative genius. For those who don't, all of it is simply a source of endless fascination. Either way, I'd be interested to know exactly why it troubles you.-
I don't find it necessary to believe in God. I do, but that is me. What is troubling to me about this line of thought is what it infers into the question of values. Specifically, why bother valuing something that has no worth outside my own head? What value do I hold outside of my head, or that of others? There are other more wild ideas that go floating around my head when I get wrapped up in a train of thought like this, but the core of what bothers me about this line of thinking is that I inevitably come back to the question of, why bother? Why bother doing all the things that we do for things that do not in fact exist at all as anything other than nebulous transient ideas?

3am musings

by David Turell @, Saturday, September 10, 2011, 00:04 (4622 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained


> I don't find it necessary to believe in God. I do, but that is me. What is troubling to me about this line of thought is what it infers into the question of values. Specifically, why bother valuing something that has no worth outside my own head? What value do I hold outside of my head, or that of others? There are other more wild ideas that go floating around my head when I get wrapped up in a train of thought like this, but the core of what bothers me about this line of thinking is that I inevitably come back to the question of, why bother? Why bother doing all the things that we do for things that do not in fact exist at all as anything other than nebulous transient ideas?-I believe also, but I decided to believe after not believing for many years. therefore I feel I have to believe. As for values outside yourself, do you feel you should leave this mortal coil a better place on departure, than you found it upon entry? I do very strongly, but I felt that way before I came back to God. I think such determinations are an individual matter.

3am musings

by BBella @, Saturday, September 10, 2011, 06:21 (4622 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Why bother doing all the things that we do for things that do not in fact exist at all as anything other than nebulous transient ideas?-More musings: -We bother because we are here and really do not have any other choice but to bother. You are. Of course you cannot be sure I am, and I cannot be sure you are. But, you can be sure, you are. Other than that, whether you know for sure what/who else is real and what is not, your desires within the physical matter you found yourself in dictates you bother. -Since there really are no answers to satisfy your wandering mind, or, no one can prove their answers if they think they have the answers (religion/science/etc), why not just choose your own answers for yourself of what to think of it all?-You could think yourself into oblivion, as the thought process above was taking you, but there are a million other choices you could also choose to think. In the end, your choice of how to think about this all is really all you have. So you can take other peoples ideas, or you can grow your own. -In the end, all that really matters (since there are no concrete answers) is that you find peace for your wandering mind. Maybe the closest thing to truth that we really have is our imagination...why not just let it run wild? What would you like for all this to really be about?

3am musings

by dhw, Sunday, September 11, 2011, 14:26 (4621 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Tony (Balance_Maintained): Why bother doing all the things that we do for things that do not in fact exist at all as anything other than nebulous transient ideas?-David and BBella have both offered you some very wise counsel, but I will add my own pennyworth. Philosophically, I have to accept the possibility that life and the world are nothing but a collection of "nebulous transient ideas", but the philosophical level is quite literally a dead end. It kills off all pleasure, all compassion, all love, all art, and in short all the things that we should treasure as part of the gift of life. What's more, it is ridiculously out of touch with all the commonsense realities of experience. BBella is absolutely right to insist that you are here. And I will insist that you are happier well-fed rather than starving, healthy rather than sick, laughing rather than weeping, being kissed rather than kicked, loving rather than hating. So are other people. This present moment and present experience is real to you, and tomorrow's experiences will also be real, and these experiences will go on being real to you until you die. The answer to the question "why bother?" is "because we're happier that way." And there is nothing nebulous about any of the above. Transient, yes ... and if our experiences were not transient, we would be sick of them in no time. I enjoy my daily ration of chocolate, but if you fed me on nothing else, how long do you think my enjoyment would last? It's the transience that gives our pleasures their special value. Even relationships constantly change, just as our own bodies are never the same from one day to the next. -It seems strange to me that someone who believes in God should question the value of his own and other people's happiness. Do you think your God could really have given us this life so that we would merely moan about its transience? My advice to you would be to get on doing all the things you really like, and do them while you're still able to do them. The one condition would be that they should not cause harm to others or to yourself (so watch it with those cigarettes). I don't know how old you are, but for heaven's sake don't "why bother" yourself into crusty old age, and then look back and start wishing you had bothered.

RSS Feed of thread
powered by my little forum