How reliable is science? (Assumption 2/7) (The limitations of science)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Thursday, April 26, 2012, 00:10 (4377 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Small edit here, I misread the original message on one part, and unthinkingly continued the mistake in my own reply. I am an INFJ, not INTJ, and INFJs are councilors. So, you might in fact be correct in that they are just completely uninterested.-Well... I caught the error... you can ignore that part. -INTP's want to build large theoretical frameworks. -INTJ's want frameworks "that work." -Neither of these types has much patience for people who have free access to the same pieces of knowledge, and don't pursue it. I'm pretty open about it: I get pretty frustrated with people. -My favorite professor in college? The one where when someone asked a question that they should have known the answer to 2 classes ago, and he said "That's a fucking stupid question. That's a 101 topic. Why are you here?" -By the end of that class, 6 students dropped, and every question asked moved the class forward. That prof was intimidating as hell, but I learned more about programming in his class than in any other, precisely because we got rid of the dead weight. (I was the one who asked the question.) -His comment on his own teaching style: "Never underestimate humiliation as an effective teaching tool."

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"