Asking of the Designer what we would of any other designer (The atheist delusion)

by xeno6696 @, Sonoran Desert, Sunday, July 31, 2011, 05:06 (4625 days ago) @ David Turell


> > http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0604027
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Or a different perspective: Insufficient data.
> 
> I view the computer model as human input of known facts in this universe. There is then supposition for an electroweak universe. That is all the paper is, supposition. Supposition is NEVER proof that such a universe can ever exist. String Theory is theory, not proof of anything. And how do we learn about life's origin here by supposing differences elsewhere that may be just fairy tales?-You're missing my point... by ignoring the other universes that could possibly exist (such as one without the electroweak force) you're engaging in identical folly as the physicists invoking the anthropic principle. One of these "failed" universes could hold a theoretical key... one that could unlock deeper secrets pertaining to our own universe--within our own model. -It's the same flaw I've seen in abiogenesis research: Stop trying to recreate life "as it was" and just "get it done."

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum