The Electric Universe (Evolution)

by David Turell , Friday, March 11, 2011, 17:28 (4815 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained


> > Has no merits. I've seen this stuff before. Read the following discussion of a distant galaxy which is gravitationally lensing a more distant galaxy which developed earlier in the universe after the Big Bang. The story gives a good discussion of early universe and plasma.
> > 
> > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/45338
> 
> 
> 
> I am not certain how you feel that disqualifies the EU hypothesis. If anything, it actually supports it because having a galaxy that old screws up the timeline in a way that would completely toss of the Big Bang theory in its current model. -I don't see how it screws up the timeline.
> 
> Secondly, the Big Bang can not account for counter rotational orbits with in our own solar system which we can study very easily. There are a couple of physical laws that such rotation and orbits violate. Aside from that, the EU theory also explains why when Earth passes Venus, they are always face to face(same side to same side) every single time. There are several other predictions that have proven true repeatedly in the EU theory that violate the BBT. -The BBT says nothing about Venus and Earth in the standard model. The moon keeps only one face to us also. One revolution per 28 days. Your example could easily be a coincidence of timing.
> 
> Saying it has no merits without offering up contradictions to it predictions is not really saying anything more than, "I don't like it so it can't be true."-No, it's just that I like the majority opinion which is overwhelming.