The Big Bang (Origins)

by George Jelliss ⌂ @, Crewe, Monday, May 10, 2010, 20:31 (5072 days ago) @ David Turell

Sorry I'm late responding to this:
"Here is a discussion of chirality of amino acids from a math probability view that totally negates George's theory, using math"-That article is just the same old same old whirlwind in a junkyard argument.
What Pasteur showed was that life, in the form of grubs or flies, do not emerge by spontaneous generation. He did not show that chiral molecules cannot emerge from series of series of chemical reactions over long time periods and under many changing environmental conditions. Once life was established, using molecules of particular chirality, then of course it continued to reproduce molecules of the same chirality. That is what reproduction means.

--
GPJ


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum