Natural Selection and what it didn\'t do for dogs... (Evolution)

by David Turell @, Thursday, February 04, 2010, 19:28 (5215 days ago) @ xeno6696
edited by unknown, Thursday, February 04, 2010, 19:34


>If it takes at worst, 40,000 years to get a pug from a wolf, why can't natural selection be seen as a sufficient force for change? 
> 
> Any thoughts?-And now a new book with lots of negative comments about Darwin and his theory: -
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527466.100-survival-of-the-fittest-theory-darwinisms-limits.html?page=3-"What Darwin Got Wrong" by Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini. Lots of reasonable negative comments after the article, But to me both the article and the comments reinforce my contention that the process is completely passive.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum