Light and Matter (Origins)

by GateKeeper @, Thursday, May 29, 2014, 18:59 (3591 days ago) @ dhw

I don't know if i should even post this. Its so much writing for me. -I see. this has a lot of stuff that can be addressed. I posted a quick response to what QED is. We can have QGD and others.-to start. They don't know more than they know. We have to understand this. Where the confusion lies in main stream knowledge is that they don't really know what "pure energy" is. So to use it as a descriptor, at this level, isn't really an option yet. Like you say, and I think it is a great idea, is to try and look from "particles" to "energy".-BBella take is not exactly the way I look at it. But it is very close, I know what she means. And she explained it great in a few sentences. I do not hammer 'bits". I generally look at "the point" of a post.-energy has a few forms. As you know already. But it is interesting to me that you brought up "particles". The "photon". They don't know what it is. Waving becomes important now. "waving" is a "property" like the color "blue".-Also, quantum mech is based on "probability". basically 'what are the chances of ...". I mean even Tunneling is based on "what are the chances of an electron getting through a potential" (out of a well)-These question are way past me guy. I can address them in basic terms. I haven't done these types of calculations in 20 years or so.-photons coupled together as a "new" particle. Yes, there are "force carrying particles". This would be one not seen. But obviously "allowed". can they make "hadron" type stuff ... not known yet.-What is cool, is that as we get colder some particles can store "better" information. Remember so far, we need some possible movement, but not too much, to have "life". Information exchanged in a region space. At the very least, life looks like it has a purpose. A rock doesn't. Short term that is. If there is too much "movement" to hot, the information gets lost in the noise and thus becomes unusable.-Again, this is a basic use. And we just don't know enough yet. But we are using what we know today. Tomorrow, we will use what we know tomorrow. Also "time", we are talking in human scale terms. Time lapse shows maybe a "different type" of life. 10^-10 - is another scale that "life" can emerge. (how about -20 or -43)-I could write a book on this stuff relating to "god". basically the book would be title "it is ok to believe using real science". Hard core atheist hate that idea. Any of you want to collaborate? lol, :) -nature knows how it works ... it is stored in the states of matter. We may be the universe experiencing itself. "intense feeling"


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum