Ourcellves? (Identity)

by GateKeeper , Thursday, April 10, 2014, 14:09 (3667 days ago) @ David Turell

I would have to disagree with you there, Although I must admit, at this point we are splitting hairs. And making broad "lumped" assumptions. Get it, splitting and lumping. :)-I am a looper.-I like the very small and I like the very big. I was lucky, blessed even, to learn about electron fields begin disrupted by an emr photon. I am lucky to have followed space up to the web and back to inflation. I am not an expert tho.-By looking at only half the "equation", the brain, we may be lead to conclusion based on half the view. The phenomena of consciousness out of the brain. Or by focusing on the "mind", we are lead to the conclusion of 'emergence". Now that we know a group of atoms in the states they are for our brain, then the mind because a function of this state. The next "emergent" quality will be an "all human consciousness". Or, we are the "brain" of Giai.-For me, There is a "you". If I take you apart and find "No You" what does that mean? For me, you do exist, "you" are a field that can describe you. Just because I took you apart and found "no piece of you" doesn't lead me to any one conclusion yet. We don't know enough for me to do that.
 
For me, that's what dualism seems to be doing. It has a limited focusing knob. It is either course or fine. Which is ok in many instances. but when we look at "intermediate truth's" (we aren't sure truth's))we may need a "finer incremental" adjusting knob. Maybe not even one. We may not even have to "look through the "glass". Just stand ware we are and talk about it.